1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 205 A.D.2d
  5. 205 A.D.2d 470 (1994)
 

PEOPLE v. FRANKLIN

205 A.D.2d 470 (1994)

614 N.Y.S.2d 9

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Franklin, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 30, 1994

It is settled that, in examining the adequacy of the proof, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and uphold a judgment of conviction where a rational trier of the facts could have found all of the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620). Moreover, great deference must be accorded to the factfinder...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases