1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 432 Pa.Super.
  5. 432 Pa.Super. 230 (1994)
 

UHL v. C.H. SHOEMAKER & SON, INC.

432 Pa.Super. 230 (1994)

637 A.2d 1358

Donald UHL & Janice Uhl, H/W v. C.H. SHOEMAKER & SON, INC., and Mr. Goodbuys of Penna. and Mr. Goodbuys, Inc., and Mr. Goodbuys Realty Corp. Donald UHL & Janice Uhl, H/W v. ACE LUMBER AND MILLWORK CO., INC., a/k/a Ace Lumber and Jad Enterprises, Inc., t/a Ace Lumber and Millwork Co. and Alm Corp. and Peter Lumber Company a/k/a Peter Lumber Company, Inc. Appeal of C.H. SHOEMAKER & SON, INC.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed March 1, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Goodyear, Philadelphia, for appellant.

John F. Beggin, Philadelphia, for Uhl, appellees.

Before ROWLEY, President Judge, and OLSZEWSKI and BECK, JJ.

OLSZEWSKI, Judge.

C.H. Shoemaker & Son, Inc. ("Shoemaker") appeals from the lower court's order denying its motion for an independent medical examination ("IME"). Shoemaker argues that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that Shoemaker failed to show good cause for the IME. We affirm.

On February 3, 1987, Donald and Janice Uhl filed a complaint against Shoemaker, alleging that Donald sustained serious injuries to his right arm after falling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases