The Family Court did not abuse its discretion in awarding petitioner $7,600 in counsel fees since respondent, who has financial resources that are greatly in excess of those possessed by petitioner, was not inappropriately directed to pay the legal costs of the mother's underlying support petition. However, the court properly determined that he should not be held responsible for petitioner's repeated unnecessary motion practice. The court also did not abuse its discretion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
