Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant contends that the Family Court erred in failing to suppress the complainant's identification testimony. We disagree. The Family Court's determination that the complainant's viewing of the appellant on the front steps of the courthouse on the return date of the petition was by mere happenstance and completely spontaneous rather than the result of any improper conduct by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.