LEONARD GREER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT. ERIC LIPETZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. A. JARED SILVERMAN, CHIEF, BUREAU OF SECURITIES, DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MICHAEL MCDERMOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 24, 1994.
Decided June 17, 1994.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jerome M. Selvers argued the cause on behalf of appellant cross-respondent Leonard Greer (Sonnenblick, Parker & Selvers, attorneys; Hartley T. Bernstein, New York City co-counsel; Messrs. Selvers, Bernstein and Peter W. Till, on the brief).
Peter D. Manahan argued the cause on behalf of appellant Eric Lipetz (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys; Mr. Manahan, of counsel; John P. Lacey, on the brief).
George L. Schneider argued the cause on behalf of appellant Michael McDermott (Lorber, Schneider, Nuzzi, Vichness & Bilinkas, attorneys; Jerome M. Selvers and Mark S. Vincent of Sonnenblick, Parker & Selvers, on the brief).
William E. Graves, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause on behalf of respondent cross-appellant New Jersey Bureau of Securities on all appeals (Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General, attorney; Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Cindy K. Miller, Senior Deputy Attorney General and DAG Graves on the brief involving Greer; Michael Pariser, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief involving Lipetz; Joshua Rabinowitz, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief involving McDermott).
Before Judges COLEMAN, MUIR, Jr. and PAUL G. LEVY.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by PAUL G. LEVY, J.A.D., (temporarily assigned).
These three appeals involve witnesses subpoenaed to testify before the New Jersey Bureau of Securities (NJBS) during the course of a private investigation conducted pursuant to N.J.S.A. 49:3-68(a)(1). Each witness requested a copy of the transcript of their testimony, but NJBS refused based on Bureau policy which allows witnesses and their counsel to review transcripts only...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
