Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
According to the defendant, a third vehicle hit his own vehicle, causing it to collide with the plaintiffs' vehicle. We find that the jury's verdict that the defendant failed to operate his vehicle in a safe and reasonable manner but that his negligence was not a proximate cause of the automobile accident was not inconsistent (PJI 2:72; see generally, Gralton v Oliver, 277 App Div 449, affd
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.