The court's Sandoval ruling, which permitted the People to elicit that defendant had been previously charged with a crime without reference to the underlying criminal acts, that he failed to answer the charges, and that he thereafter used an alias and false address and social security number, was a proper exercise of discretion, such matters being relevant to defendant's credibility (see, People v Moore,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. McFARLANE
205 A.D.2d 447 (1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 895
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Trevor McFarlane, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 28, 1994
June 28, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
