SCHUMACHER v. TOWN OF JUPITER

No. 93-1527.

643 So.2d 8 (1994)

Richard E. SCHUMACHER, Appellant, v. TOWN OF JUPITER, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Rehearing Denied October 27, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Beranek of Aurell Radey Hinkle Thomas & Beranek, Tallahassee, and J. Michael Burman of Slawson, Burman & Critton, North Palm Beach, for appellant.

Thomas J. Baird of Watterson Hyland Baird & Klett, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, and Nancy E. Stroud of Burke, Bosselman & Weaver, Boca Raton, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

We affirm, finding no error by the trial court in holding that Jupiter did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in amending a zoning ordinance and that appellant had waived any defect in the notice provided to him of the proceedings during which the change was effected.

As to the validity of the zoning scheme excluding automobile dealerships itself we rest our decision on the discussion and analysis in Restigouche, Inc. v. Town of Jupiter,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases