1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 205 Mich.
  5. 205 Mich. App. 446 (1994)
 

MADDOX v. BURLINGAME

Docket No. 144770.

205 Mich. App. 446 (1994)

517 N.W.2d 816

MADDOX v. BURLINGAME

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided June 6, 1994, at 9:20 A.M.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis E. Moffett, for the plaintiffs.

Maddin, Hauser, Wartell, Roth, Heller & Pesses (by Nathaniel H. Simpson and Harvey R. Heller), for the defendants.

Before: WEAVER, P.J., and SHEPHERD and D.A. JOHNSTON, III, JJ.

SHEPHERD, J.

In this appeal as of right, we consider whether plaintiffs' legal malpractice claim against defendant1 is barred by the two-year statute of limitations. MCL 600.5805(4); MSA 27A.5805(4). After initially denying defendant's motion, the trial court subsequently granted defendant's motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). We reverse.

Defendant was consulted by plaintiffs in September of 1986 relative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases