WASHINGTON MUTUAL SAVINGS BANK v. HEDREEN

No. 61224-2.

125 Wn.2d 521 (1994)

886 P.2d 1121

WASHINGTON MUTUAL SAVINGS BANK, Respondent, v. RICHARD C. HEDREEN, ET AL, Petitioners.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 22, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, by Daniel P. Pepple and Jackson Schmidt; Edwards, Sieh, Wiggins & Hathaway, by Howard M. Goodfriend, for petitioners.

Foster Pepper & Shefelman, Charles P. Nomellini, and Clifford M. Curry, for respondent.


DOLLIVER, J.

Richard and Elizabeth Hedreen challenge the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, affirming the trial court's reformation of a lease, into which they entered with Hedreen Company, to accord with a loan commitment letter issued to them by Washington Mutual Savings Bank. See Washington Mut. Sav. Bank v. Hedreen, noted at 71 Wn.App. 1019 (1993). They also challenge the trial court's ruling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases