DICKIE v. CITY OF TOMAH

No. 92-3034.

190 Wis.2d 455 (1994)

527 N.W.2d 697

Dean A. DICKIE, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross Respondent, v. CITY OF TOMAH, a municipal corporation of the state of Wisconsin, Defendant-Respondent-Cross Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided December 29, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant-cross respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of William K. Blanchard of Pope & John, Ltd. of Chicago, and Daniel C. Arndt of Arndt, Buswell & Thorn of Sparta. Oral argument by William K Blanchard.

For the defendant-respondent-cross appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert J. Mubarak and Richard A. Radcliffe of Mubarak Law Office, S.C., of Tomah, and Benjamin Southwick of Richland Center. Oral argument by Richard A. Radcliffe.

Before Eich, C.J., Gartzke, P.J., and Sundby, J.


GARTZKE, P.J.

Dean Dickie appeals from a circuit court order partially denying his motion for his litigation expenses under § 32.28(3), STATS., in the condemnation proceeding the City of Tomah used to acquire his land. The issue is whether Dickie, an attorney, is entitled to the fees his law firm charged for representing him in the condemnation proceeding. We conclude, as did the circuit court, that Dickie can recover his law firm's disbursements, including fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases