1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 180 Ariz.
  5. 180 Ariz. 464 (1994)
 

PROVIDENT NAT. ASSURANCE CO. v. SBROCCA

No. 1 CA-CV 92-0473.

180 Ariz. 464 (1994)

885 P.2d 152

PROVIDENT NATIONAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Romano SBROCCA and Rosanne Sbrocca, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Review Denied December 20, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Polese, Hiner & Nolan, P.A. by Patricia E. Nolan, Lynn M. Allen, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellee.

James P. Pulito, Phoenix, for defendants-appellants.

OPINION

WEISBERG, Presiding Judge.

Appellants Romano and Rosanne Sbrocca ("Sbroccas") appeal from the trial court's judgment of $217,223.71 in favor of appellee Provident National Assurance Company ("Provident") based on a written guaranty. The issue we decide is whether the nonrecourse nature of the underlying promissory note prevents a mortgagee from pursuing collection remedies against the guarantors of that note. We hold that it does not.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases