1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 282 N.J.
  5. 282 N.J. Super. 355 (1994)
 

MITZNER v. LIGHTS 18 INC.

282 N.J. Super. 355 (1994)

660 A.2d 512

MILTON MITZNER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LIGHTS 18 INC., DAVID MITZNER AND JOAN MITZNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 21, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Cirafesi argued the cause for appellants (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Linda Lashbrook, of counsel and on the brief; Peter Tober, on the brief).

Adam D. Mitzner, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Kovacs & Rader, attorneys; Sanford Rader, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, LONG and LANDAU.

PER CURIAM.

Since 1972, Lights 18, Inc. has been a corporation engaged in the retail lighting business in East Brunswick, New Jersey. It was formed by two brothers, plaintiff, Milton and defendant, David Mitzner. Each brother was a fifty percent owner of the stock of the corporation and originally both worked in the business although Milton was there full-time while David also held other employment. David developed multiple sclerosis in the late 1970's and has [since...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases