The debriefing agreement between the parties stated that the People were to be the sole judge of whether defendant's cooperation warranted a reduced sentence. Absent factual support for defendant's claim that he was being truthful in his debriefing sessions with the prosecutors, it cannot be said that the sentencing court abused its discretion in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without conducting a hearing on why the prosecutors had concluded otherwise (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ANONYMOUS
208 A.D.2d 426 (1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 1009
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anonymous, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 18, 1994
October 18, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
