1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 31 Cal.App.4th
  5. 31 Cal.App.4th 32 (1994)
 

CITY OF FRESNO v. PRESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Docket No. F018818.

31 Cal.App.4th 32 (1994)

36 Cal. Rptr.2d 456

CITY OF FRESNO, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. PRESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

December 23, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wild, Carter, Tipton & Oliver, Kent C. Parr and Robert C. Schmalle for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

James P. Lough, City Attorney, and Edwin A. Oeser, Assistant City Attorney, for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

STONE (W.A.), Acting P.J.

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether the City of Fresno's municipal ordinance which restricts the door-to-door distribution of certain categories of written materials is constitutional. We are concerned with two parts of the ordinance. First, the ordinance prohibits-door-to-door distribution of advertisements and unauthorized newspapers when the owner or occupant of a residence or business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases