1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 271 N.J.
  5. 271 N.J. Super. 359 (1994)
 

MELLETZ v. MELLETZ

271 N.J. Super. 359 (1994)

638 A.2d 898

PAUL R. MELLETZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ELSA W. MELLETZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 15, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven B. Sacharow argued the cause for appellant (Sacharow, Adler, Gold, Taylor & Keyser, attorneys; Mr. Sacharow on the letter brief and Barbara J. Snavely, on the brief).

Gary L. Borger argued the cause for respondent (Lisa L. Ulrich, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, DREIER and BROCHIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a post-judgment matrimonial order, entered after a plenary hearing, denying his motion to suspend alimony payments because of defendant's alleged cohabitation with a male friend. Judge Grasso determined that the cohabitation clause in the parties' settlement agreement was unfair, inequitable and unenforceable, and thus refused to suspend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases