1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 515 N.W.2d
  5. 515 N.W.2d 114 (1994)
 

GUSTAFSON v. CHESTNUT

No. C0-93-869.

515 N.W.2d 114 (1994)

John GUSTAFSON, Appellant, v. Jack CHESTNUT, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin S. Houge, Coughlin & Houge, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Kay Nord Hunt, Phillip A. Cole, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by ANDERSON, C.J., and LANSING and MULALLY, JJ.

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Judge.

Appellant John H. Gustafson sued respondents Jack Chestnut, Alan Demmer, and their law firm, respondent Chestnut & Brooks, for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and misrepresentation. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of respondents, concluding that respondents' alleged malpractice was not the cause of Gustafson's damages. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases