Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant's first argument, that the evidence before the Grand Jury was legally insufficient to support the charges contained in Indictment No. 3558/91, is beyond the scope of appellate review as a result of the defendant's plea of guilty to the crime of robbery in the first degree in satisfaction of that indictment (see, People v Dunbar,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.