IN RE PATERNITY OF TUKKER M.O.

No. 93-1929.

189 Wis.2d 440 (1994)

525 N.W.2d 793

IN RE THE PATERNITY OF: TUKKER M.O.: MARY L.O., Petitioner-Respondent, v. TOMMY R.B., Jr., Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided November 30, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the respondent-appellant, there were briefs submitted by James J. Podell and Carlton D. Stansbury of Law Offices of Podell & Podell of Milwaukee and by William W. Moir, III of Hayes, Neumann, Humke, Moir & Bolgert, S.C. of Sheboygan. There was oral argument by Carlton D. Stansbury.

On behalf of the petitioner-respondent, there was a brief submitted by Carl K. Buesing and Robert H. Halvorsen of Halvorsen & Buesing of Sheboygan. There was oral argument by Carl K. Buesing.

Before Brown, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ.


BROWN, J.

This is a paternity case where the evidence was that the average professional football punter's career lasts about four years. The family court ordered that seventeen percent of Tommy R.B., Jr.'s $400,000 plus football salary be paid as child support and that a major portion be allocated to a trust now to insure Tukker's future needs after Tommy's football career ends. We disagree with the family court's decision to use the percentage standards in this high...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases