1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 442 S.E.2d
  5. 442 S.E.2d 183 (1994)
 

BOOKMAN v. SHAKESPEARE CO.

No. 2154.

442 S.E.2d 183 (1994)

Tracy D. BOOKMAN, Appellant, v. SHAKESPEARE COMPANY and Norman Rutherford, Defendants, OF WHOM Shakespeare Company is Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided January 31, 1994.

Certiorari Denied July 14, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. McCravy, III, and Bradley W. Knott, Greenwood, for appellant.

D. Clay Robinson and James M. Brailsford, III, Columbia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This is an employment handbook case. The trial judge granted summary judgment to the employer.1 Bookman appeals. We affirm.

Bookman began working for Shakespeare in 1991. She received an employee handbook that specified immediate termination for "[e]ngaging in physical violence and fighting." It is undisputed that this handbook did not alter the at-will employment relationship. Thus, either party could terminate the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases