1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 73 Wn.
  5. 73 Wn. App. 550 (1994)
 

TENNYSON v. PLUM CREEK TIMBER CO.

No. 32262-1-I.

73 Wn. App. 550 (1994)

872 P.2d 524

KEVIN TENNYSON, ET AL, Appellants, v. PLUM CREEK TIMBER CO., ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

April 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene M. Moen and Chemnick, Moen & Greenstreet, for appellants.

J. Thomas Richardson and Cairncross & Hempelmann, P.S.; Bertil F. Johnson and Davies Pearson, P.C.; Walter G. Meyer and Meyer, Fluegge & Tenney; James S. Berg and Halverson & Applegate, P.S., for respondents.

COLEMAN, J.

Kevin Tennyson appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Plum Creek Timber Co., C. Wyss & Son, Inc., Blue Dot Excavating, Inc., and Lumsden Logging, Inc., "the contractors". Tennyson contends that (1) the altered gravel mound was "latent" as a matter of law under RCW 4.24.210,1 (2) the contractors may not claim immunity under RCW 4.24.210, and (3) the completion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases