Respondent's determination not to recertify petitioner to the Family Court Panel did not deprive petitioner of her constitutional right to due process, the rules pertaining to recertification (22 NYCRR 611.4, 611.5), unlike that pertaining to complaints against panel members concerning their professional conduct (22 NYCRR 611.8), requiring neither a hearing nor a written statement of reasons (see, Board of Regents v Roth,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF BRYER v. FAMILY COURT PANEL PLAN
205 A.D.2d 406 (1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 609
In the Matter of Madeline L. Bryer, Appellant, v. Family Court Panel Plan et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 21, 1994
June 21, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.