Defendant's motion to suppress his statement was properly denied. There is nothing in the record to substantiate defendant's claim that he was arraigned within the meaning of CPL 1.20 (9) earlier than April 1990 (see, People ex rel. Kehoe v Harkness,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.