Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly declined to suppress the in-court identification of the defendant by a witness to the robbery. The testimony adduced at the Wade hearing establishes that the witness observed the defendant at close range, under good lighting conditions, for approximately two minutes, and that the witness gave a detailed description of the defendant to the police the day...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.