1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 209 A.D.2d
  5. 209 A.D.2d 392 (1994)
 

PERRY v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTH.

209 A.D.2d 392 (1994)

618 N.Y.S.2d 111

Joseph R. Perry, Appellant, v. New York City Transit Authority, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 7, 1994

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention that the defendant owed him a special duty of care because of his alleged intoxication, the defendant owed no duty to the plaintiff other than the duty of ordinary care under the circumstances (see, Crosland v New York City Tr. Auth., 68 N.Y.2d 165). The defendant owed no special duty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases