1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 209 A.D.2d
  5. 209 A.D.2d 392 (1994)
 

PELINSKY v. ROCKENSIES

209 A.D.2d 392 (1994)

618 N.Y.S.2d 103

Lara Pelinsky et al., Appellants, v. Todd C. Rockensies et al., Defendants, and Arnold Sokoloff et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Theresa Constanzo et al., Appellants, v. Township of Hempstead et al., Defendants, and Arnold Sokoloff et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.) (And Other Titles.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 7, 1994

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that no action against the defendants Arnold and Carolyn Sokoloff was viable under General Obligations Law § 11-100. General Obligations Law § 11-100 (1) provides in relevant part that: "[a]ny person who shall be injured * * * by reason of the intoxication * * * of any person under the age of twenty-one years * * * shall have a right of action * * * against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases