X.L.O. CONCRETE v. RIVERGATE


83 N.Y.2d 513 (1994)

634 N.E.2d 158

611 N.Y.S.2d 786

X.L.O. Concrete Corp., Respondent, v. Rivergate Corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 24, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bragar & Wexler, P. C., New York City (Raymond A. Bragar, Paul D. Wexler and Beth A. Willensky of counsel), for appellant.

Lester Gulitz, Peekskill, for respondent.

G. Oliver Koppell, Attorney-General, New York City (George Sampson, Jerry Boone, Robert Hubbard and Joseph Opper of counsel), pro se, amicus curiae.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, BELLACOSA, SMITH and LEVINE concur; Judge TITONE taking no part.


CIPARICK, J.

The question presented in this action for breach of contract, account stated, and unjust enrichment is whether interposition of an antitrust illegality defense under the Donnelly Act (General Business Law § 340 et seq.) prevents enforcement of the contract between these parties as a matter of law. We conclude that material questions of fact exist which preclude granting summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases