Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Eyewitnesses testified that the defendant and his companion were each holding a gun, but they did not know who fired the shot that hit the victim's jaw. The defendant argues that the jury verdict convicting him of assault in the first degree and acquitting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree was repugnant. We disagree.
"When there is a claim that repugnant jury verdicts have been rendered in response...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
