1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 517 N.W.2d
  5. 517 N.W.2d 76 (1994)
 

PFEIFFER v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. C2-93-2137.

517 N.W.2d 76 (1994)

Frederick R. PFEIFFER, et al., Appellants, v. FORD MOTOR CO., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 11, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard G. Nadler, Richard G. Nadler & Assocs., Thomas J. Lyons, Lyons, Sawicki, Neese & Phelps, St. Paul, for appellants.

Vernle C. Durocher, Jr., Kevin J. Saville, Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., D. Douglas Blanke, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for amicus curiae State of Minn.

Considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and CRIPPEN and MULALLY, JJ.

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

After Frederick and June Pfeiffer were denied relief by Ford Motor Company's informal dispute mechanism under the Minnesota Lemon Law, they sold an allegedly defective Ford F-250 pickup truck. They proceeded with an action in conciliation court approximately 75 days later and were awarded over $4,000 in damages. The district court granted Ford summary judgment on its appeal from the conciliation court, finding the Pfeiffers failed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases