1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 270 N.J.
  5. 270 N.J. Super. 323 (1994)
 

PAO-KUO CHIN v. COVENTRY SQUARE CONDO.

270 N.J. Super. 323 (1994)

637 A.2d 197

DR. PAO-KUO CHIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. COVENTRY SQUARE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ARTHUR CHESLEY, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. COVENTRY SQUARE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary S. Beninson, argued the cause for appellant (Goldman & Beninson, attorneys; Mr. Beninson on the brief).

John W. O'Mara, argued the cause for the Chesley respondents (Boglioli, O'Mara, Reynolds & Mirra, attorneys; Mr. O'Mara on the joint brief).

Dr. Pao-Kuo Chin, respondent, argued pro se (Dr. Chin on the joint brief).

Before KING, HAVEY and A.A. RODRIGUEZ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.

Coventry Square Condominium Association appeals from a judgment, entered after our remand, declaring invalid a $375 fee charged by the Association to condominium owners each time they rented their units. The judgment also compels the Association to refund over $90,000 to the owner-landlords, representing fees collected since 1989. We conclude that a condominium...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases