Contrary to respondent's arguments on appeal, it is plain that its denial of a rental increase for alleged improvements to the subject apartment was based exclusively on the fact that the alleged improvements were paid for out of the proceeds of hazard insurance, and the determination can be sustained only on that ground (see, Matter of Trump-Equitable Fifth Ave. Co. v Gliedman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.