PEOPLE v. ALLEN


200 A.D.2d 387 (1994)

608 N.Y.S.2d 77

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clarence Allen, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 6, 1994


Contrary to defendant's contention, the Trial Justice did not abuse his discretion when he denied an adjournment to give defendant a further opportunity to produce a witness. Defendant was unable to state when the witness could appear and failed to establish that the testimony of this witness was material (People v Foy, 32 N.Y.2d 473).

Nor did the court err in curtailing defense counsel's attempt on cross-examination to explain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases