BELLIAN v. BICRON CORP.

No. 93-354.

69 Ohio St.3d 517 (1994)

BELLIAN, APPELLANT, v. BICRON CORPORATION, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 29, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thrasher, Dinsmore & Dolan, Lawrence J. Dolan and Paul T. Murphy, for appellant.

Spieth, Bell, McCurdy & Newell Co., L.P.A., Nancy A Shaw, Bruce G. Hearey and Debra L. Kackley; Petersen, Ibold & Wantz and Jerry Petersen, for appellee.

Louis A Jacobs; Spater, Gittes, Schulte & Kolman and Frederick M. Gittes, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Employment Lawyers Association.


FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., J.

The issue before this court is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of appellee on the grounds that: (1) appellant's claim is barred because he did not file his age discrimination claim within the one-hundred-eighty-day statute of limitations period set forth in R.C. 4112.02(N), and (2) no genuine issue of material fact exists to prevent summary judgment on appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases