1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 276 N.J.
  5. 276 N.J. Super. 310 (1994)
 

ALK ASSOCIATES v. MULTIMODAL APP. SYS.

276 N.J. Super. 310 (1994)

647 A.2d 1359

ALK ASSOCIATES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MULTIMODAL APPLIED SYSTEMS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, CARL VAN DYKE, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND INGRID BRANDLE, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 6, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert G. Shepherd argued the cause for appellants (Mathews, Woodbridge & Collins, attorneys; Brooks R. Bruneau, on the brief).

Deborah A. Savarese, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Mason, Briody, Gallagher & Taylor, attorneys; Arthur G. Lash, Ms. Savarese, Stephen L. Humphrey and Charles A. Spitulnik, on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, DREIER and VILLANUEVA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Defendants appeal by leave granted from a Chancery Division discovery order requiring that defendants disclose trade secrets to plaintiff under a protective order forbidding plaintiff to use the information. Defendants contend that a disclosure solely to plaintiff's counsel and designated experts, prohibiting dissemination of these secrets to the individual defendants' former employer, is needed to protect defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases