MERRILL LYNCH v. SUMI OHNUMA


161 Misc.2d 423 (1994)

613 N.Y.S.2d 811

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Petitioner, v. Sumi Ohnuma et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, New York County.

May 20, 1994


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, New York City (Francis S. Chlapowski of counsel), for petitioner. Feltman, Karesh, Major & Farbman, New York City (Adam M. Cohen of counsel), for respondents.


JANE S. SOLOMON, J.

In these 16 proceedings, petitioner Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch) seeks to stay, permanently, arbitration proceedings brought by the respondents before the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD).1 The petitions each allege that respondents' claims are ineligible for submission to arbitration under section 15 of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases