In an action for medical malpractice alleging, inter alia, misdiagnosis of the condition that led to plaintiff's cerebral aneurysm, plaintiff claims error in allowing the emergency medical services technician to testify that when he arrived at the scene, he was told by the comatose plaintiff's niece that plaintiff had used crack cocaine the night before. Similar evidence had already been admitted without objection through the testimony of several witnesses. Even if the medical technician's testimony did not qualify as a business record exception to the hearsay rule because the declarant was under no duty to provide the information (see, Matter of Leon RR, 48 N.Y.2d 117, 122-123), it was not admitted for the truth of the matter asserted, but for the purpose of showing the technician's state of mind with respect to plaintiff's condition, and thus was not hearsay at all (see, People v Salko, 47 N.Y.2d 230, 239). Nor was such testimony prejudicial and irrelevant evidence of past drug abuse, since, based upon expert testimony concerning the impact of cocaine use on incrementally-induced conditions such as plaintiff's, the testimony was pertinent to diagnosis and treatment (see, e.g., Campbell v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 81 A.D.2d 529). Moreover, since plaintiff's counsel both commented upon and elicited related matters, she cannot now be heard to complain.
RIVERA v. CITY OF NEW YORK
200 A.D.2d 379 (1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 193
Gloria M. Rivera, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 6, 1994
January 6, 1994
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.