Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that certain minor discrepancies between the arresting officer's hearing testimony and trial testimony rendered his hearing testimony incredible as a matter of law is not properly before this Court, since the defendant never moved at trial to reopen the suppression hearing on this basis (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Sumpter,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.