1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 68 Ohio
  5. 68 Ohio St.3d 507 (1994)
 

STATE EX REL. HILL v. NIEHAUS

No. 93-1187.

68 Ohio St.3d 507 (1994)

THE STATE EX REL. HILL, APPELLANT, v. NIEHAUS, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 23, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Fred Hoefle, Kenneth J. Koenig and Chuck Stidham, for appellant.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Christian J. Schaefer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The court of appeals did not err in dismissing Hill's mandamus and prohibition complaint. The trial court has authority to resolve disputes and correct factual errors in a trial record, including disputes over when a verdict form was filed or the effect of a document's being filed late. See State v. Schiebel (1990), 55 Ohio St.3d 71, 81, 564 N.E.2d 54, 66; Reichert v. Ingersoll (1985),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases