There can be no dispute with respondent's contention that petitioner had no vested right to permanent appointment by reason of his position on the eligibility list, and that the appointing officer had broad discretion to select among the various individuals on the list (see, Matter of Aladin v Schultz,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.