We reject plaintiffs' contention that the two written statements defendant-respondent submitted to show a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense do not qualify as oaths and therefore should not have been considered. There is no specific form of oath required in this State (see, General Construction Law § 36), other than that it be "calculated to awaken the conscience and impress the mind of the person taking it in accordance with his [sic...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
