MIKO v. MIKO


283 N.J. Super. 287 (1994)

661 A.2d 859

DOROTHY MIKO, PLAINTIFF, v. RICHARD MIKO, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County.

Decided August 17, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Radol, for plaintiff (Jacoby & Meyers, attorneys).

Joseph Haskins, for Marilyn Miko (Haskins & Blunt, P.A., attorneys).

John Cummings, for EDO Corporation, intervenor (McElroy, Deutsch & Mulvaney, attorneys).


KOBLITZ, J.S.C.

This decision arises from a motion brought by EDO Corporation to determine whether it should pay survivorship benefits to the named beneficiary of the decedent's pension plan, Marilyn Miko, or to the plaintiff, the decedent's first wife, Dorothy Miko. Both Marilyn and Dorothy Miko submitted briefs in response to EDO's motion. The issue raised by EDO's motion is whether or not a judgment, which was entered against the deceased defendant for unallocated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases