1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 518 N.W.2d
  5. 518 N.W.2d 49 (1994)
 

PEDRO COMPANIES v. SENTRY INS.

No. C9-94-72.

518 N.W.2d 49 (1994)

The PEDRO COMPANIES, et al., Appellants, v. SENTRY INSURANCE, a Mutual Company, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 14, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia J. Hartmann, St. Paul, for appellants.

James M. Mahoney, David J. Yarosh, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and SHORT and HOLTAN, JJ.

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellants The Pedro Companies, Carl Pedro, Jr. and Eugene Pedro seek reversal of the district court's grant of summary judgment, arguing that respondent Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company (Sentry) was not prejudiced by late notice of the Alfred Pedro lawsuit and thus is responsible for costs and attorney fees incurred in defending the slander claim. We affirm.

FACTS

Alfred Pedro, Carl Pedro, Jr., and Eugene Pedro...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases