1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 518 N.W.2d
  5. 518 N.W.2d 46 (1994)
 

HAGSTROM v. AMERICAN CIRCUIT BREAKER

No. C5-93-2424.

518 N.W.2d 46 (1994)

Charles H. HAGSTROM and Richard A. Edlund, d/b/a C & R ASSOCIATES, Appellants, v. AMERICAN CIRCUIT BREAKER CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 24, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter J. McCall, Mark M. Nolan, Stapleton, Nolan & McCall, P.A., St. Paul, for appellants.

Stephen J. Snyder, Brooks F. Poley, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and FORSBERG and DAVIES, JJ.

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

A manufacturer and an independent sales representative dispute whether their sales agreement has been effectively terminated. The district court granted summary judgment for the manufacturer, holding that the parties' contractual choice of law provision applied and that the sales agreement had been effectively terminated. We agree that the contractual choice of law is enforceable, and we affirm.

FACTS

American Circuit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases