Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the trial court failed to instruct the jury on the statutory definition of "serious physical injury," and that the trial court should not have inserted the language "may be used" or "might have been used" into the definition of "dangerous instrument," has not been preserved for appellate review since the defendant neither requested such a charge nor objected to the jury charge on this basis (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.