1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 200 A.D.2d
  5. 200 A.D.2d 363 (1994)
 

MILFORD PLAZA ASSOCS. v. HEARST CORP.

200 A.D.2d 363 (1994)

606 N.Y.S.2d 184

Milford Plaza Associates, Appellant, v. Hearst Corporation et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 4, 1994

The IAS Court properly concluded that the statements at issue were not reasonably susceptible of a factual interpretation and, therefore, were not actionable. The dispositive inquiry in this State is whether a reasonable reader of a publication could have concluded that it was conveying facts about the plaintiff (Gross v New York Times Co., 82 N.Y.2d 146). No reasonable reader of defendant Grizzard's column could have concluded that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases