SEPTA v. UNION SWITCH & SIGNAL


161 Pa.Commw. 400 (1994)

637 A.2d 662

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. UNION SWITCH & SIGNAL, INC., Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided January 14, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor P. Stabile, for petitioner.

George D. Wenick, for respondent.

Before DOYLE and PELLEGRINI, JJ., and RODGERS, Senior Judge.


PELLEGRINI, Judge.

The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals from an order of the Board of Claims denying its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the Board of Claims determined that it had exclusive jurisdiction to hear a contract claim filed against SEPTA by Union Switch & Signal, Inc. (Union Switch).

On January 23, 1989, Union Switch and SEPTA entered into a contract by which Union Switch agreed to supply and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases