The IAS Court properly determined that appellant was not entitled to the five-day notice requirement contained in Executive Law § 259-i (3) (c) (iii), since Executive Law § 259-i (3) (c) (i) eliminated the necessity for a preliminary revocation hearing in appellant's case, due to his 1992 conviction in North Carolina while still under parole supervision in New York (Matter of Gonzalez v New York State Div. of Parole,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE EX REL. COURTNEY v. NEW YORK STATE DIV. OF PAROLE
208 A.D.2d 352 (1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 740
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Courtney, Appellant, v. New York State Division of Parole, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 4, 1994
October 4, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.