STATE EX REL. SEIKBERT, v. WILKINSON

No. 92-1231.

69 Ohio St.3d 489 (1994)

THE STATE EX REL. SEIKBERT, APPELLANT, v. WILKINSON, DIRECTOR, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 22, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald W. Seikbert, pro se.


Per Curiam.

Seikbert asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his complaint for a writ of mandamus since the APA ignored his plea agreement by failing to release him on parole after his minimum term of incarceration had expired. In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the relator must establish a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that respondent has a clear legal duty to perform the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases