ROTH v. RHODES

Docket No. G013651.

25 Cal.App.4th 530 (1994)

30 Cal. Rptr. 706

IVAR ROTH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FRANK A. RHODES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

May 31, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

James F. McGee for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Layman, Jones & Dye, Kevin P. Bjerregaard and Robert B. Beauchamp for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

RYLAARSDAM, J.*

May operators of medical buildings limit acceptable tenants to medical doctors or do statutory or common law prohibitions require them to lease space to other health care practitioners, in this instance, a podiatrist, or even the world at large? We conclude under the facts presented here, no legal requirement compels landlords to accept tenants who are not medical doctors.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases