1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 33 F.3d
  5. 33 F.3d 518 (1994)
 

BLOOM v. HEARST ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

No. 93-1829.

33 F.3d 518 (1994)

John BLOOM and Jim Atkinson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HEARST ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied November 8, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Chaney and A.B. Conant, Jr., Conant, Whittenburg, Whittenburg & Schachter, Dallas, TX, for appellants.

Jerry L. Hiersche, Jay M. Rosenberg, Miller, Hiersche, Martens & Hayward, Dallas, TX and Philip R. Hoffman, Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn, New York City, for Hearst Entertainment and King Phoenix.

Before GOLDBERG, KING and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

John Bloom and Jim Atkinson ("appellants") appeal from a decision of the Northern District of Texas in a contract dispute. Appellants brought suit in Texas State Court against appellees, claiming that they possessed the home video rights to a motion picture based on a book written by them. The appellees removed the case to the federal district court. The District Court ruled against the appellants, issuing findings of fact and conclusions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases